Welcome to the BEAM Forum!

We encourage you to sign in our forum and participate in the BEAM community. The forum is maintained by the BEAM project team who will most likely answer your questions within 24 hours (except during common holidays) - if not done by other community members. Collaborate, share your knowledge and learn from other users!

If you don't find what you are looking for, please also consider the following external forums:

Combination View Flat View Tree View
Threads [ Previous | Next ]
Pin export/import differences
toggle
Hello BEAM team,

I'm finding that exporting a set of pins (as *.placemark) and then re-importing them into the same product is giving differences.

See fig attached. First set of pins 21-26 were generated, exported and then imported into the same product. The second set of pins 21-26 now in this product are the imported set and are slightly different.

Why is there a difference?

Thanks,
Pauline
Attachment

Attachments: Pin_example.JPG (54.7k)
Flag Flag
RE: Pin export/import differences
12/10/14 4:40 PM as a reply to Pauline Cocevar.
Hi Pauline,

The reason for this difference is that the geo-referencing is not 100% exact and the different way both sets are created.
When setting the pins in VISAT the pixel position of the where you have clicked is used to lookup the geo-location. This is easy and straight forward.
When the pins are read from the placemark file the geo-location is used as reference and the corresponding pixel position is searched for. And this is where the little inaccuracy comes from.

regards
Marco
Flag Flag
RE: Pin export/import differences
12/11/14 11:07 AM as a reply to Marco Peters.
Ciao Marco,

Thanks for the reply. (I agree not 100% exact geo-referencing!)

The distance shift between the two locations of Pin 21 (for the product that generated the pin and then re-imported the pin) specified above is ~0.2 km, not so small given our pixels are 1x1 km...

Best wishes,
Pauline
Flag Flag