Welcome to the BEAM Forum!

We encourage you to sign in our forum and participate in the BEAM community. The forum is maintained by the BEAM project team who will most likely answer your questions within 24 hours (except during common holidays) - if not done by other community members. Collaborate, share your knowledge and learn from other users!

If you don't find what you are looking for, please also consider the following external forums:

Combination View Flat View Tree View
Threads [ Previous | Next ]
reflectance values comparison from different lake processors

I am applying different lake processors including Eutrophic, Boreal,and C2R on Lake Erie. But they all have same results for reflectance values. considering that different lakes have been used for training the neural networks of these 3 lake processors, I was wondering if it is correct to have same output from them for reflectance.
Flag Flag
RE: reflectance values comparison from different lake processors
11/12/14 7:39 AM as a reply to Kiana Zolfaghari.
All three use the same neural nets for the atmospheric correction but different nets for the iop retrieval. The early versions of the lakes processors the used different nets for the AC but now all use the same. So it makes sense that the results are the same.

Flag Flag