Details
-
Type:
Improvement
-
Status:
Open
-
Priority:
Minor
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Affects Version/s: 1.3
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:None
Description
There are two reasons for the gaps.
1)
By the calculation from pixel position to geo-position and back to pixel position some pixels might be over leaped.
This could be solved by sub-sampling the pixel. But the algorithm will be much slower as it already is.
2) The second problem is caused by duplicated pixels in the MERIS product.
Also pixels in the lat_corr and lon_corr of AMORGOS are duplicated. This means there is just one geo-position for two pixels.
And therefore only one pixel is marked as shadow.
This could be solved by looking at the right pixel which is currently being marked and if this one is flagged as duplicated this should be marked two.
Discussion with CB before implementation.
1)
By the calculation from pixel position to geo-position and back to pixel position some pixels might be over leaped.
This could be solved by sub-sampling the pixel. But the algorithm will be much slower as it already is.
2) The second problem is caused by duplicated pixels in the MERIS product.
Also pixels in the lat_corr and lon_corr of AMORGOS are duplicated. This means there is just one geo-position for two pixels.
And therefore only one pixel is marked as shadow.
This could be solved by looking at the right pixel which is currently being marked and if this one is flagged as duplicated this should be marked two.
Discussion with CB before implementation.